Research by Denise Hines found that in a sample of college students:

- Forced sexual intercourse (physical force used for vaginal/oral/anal penetration): Men 0.6%, Women 0.4% (men slightly higher)
- Threatened sexual contact (threats of physical force): Men 0.6%, Women 0.5% (similar, men slightly higher)

Source: "Gender Differences in Sexual Assault Victimization Among College Students"

https://researchgate.net/publication/235439468_Gender_Differences_in_Sexual_Assault_Victimization_Among_College_Students

The study did find higher rates of women being victims of sexual violence overall, but that is based on moving the goalposts away from threats or phsyical force being used.

We discuss below how male victims may under report based on their own perceptions of female sexual violence below, and how that problem is almost certainly exacerbated with time. It is almost certainly exacerbated by the form of sexual violence perceived as being less severe (eg intoxicated sex vs physical coercion) too.

The 48% figure for male victims of female perpetrators, however, comes from the NIPSVS 2010 data. There are strong reasons to prioritize last-year numbers over lifetime prevalence statistics.

Why Last-Year Numbers Are More Reliable Than Lifetime Figures:

First, men who are victims of sexual violence do not receive the same support services as women. As a result, they are more likely to drop out of the population that participates in surveys—through homelessness, institutionalization, drug addiction, job loss, or suicide. This systematically distorts the statistics downward for male victimization.

The CDC’s own *National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NIPSVS) 2023/2024 Intimate Partner Violence Data Brief* acknowledges this limitation under the “Limitations” section:

“Second, the sampling frame does not include adults in institutional settings, or those who are unhoused, potentially underestimating the prevalence of IPV in the U.S.”

Household-based surveys like the NIPSVS exclude or severely under-represent people who are homeless or institutionalized. Because these groups are disproportionately male, any factor that pushes male victims out of stable housing or into institutions at higher rates will lower the measured prevalence of male victimization.

Both men and women tend to view female aggression as less serious than equivalent aggression by men—and this bias actually intensifies over time.

**Ahola (2010) – “Is Justice Really Blind? Effects of Crime Descriptions, Defendant Gender and Appearance, and Legal Practitioner Gender on Sentences and Defendant Evaluations in a Mock Trial.”**

Ahola’s dissertation and associated paper (published in *Psychology and Law*) used simulated court cases and eyewitness scenarios involving equivalent levels of violence and aggression. Key findings include:

- Eyewitnesses judged male perpetrators more severely than equally violent female perpetrators. The same aggressive or violent act was rated as less serious when committed by a woman.
- The bias strengthened over time: When judgments were delayed (e.g., two weeks after witnessing the event), the gender difference became more pronounced. Male perpetrators were judged even more sternly relative to females as memory faded and participants relied more on stereotypes.

Source summary: ScienceDaily coverage (May 25, 2010) of Ahola’s Stockholm University work, based on approximately 300 simulated cases with experienced legal actors and students.

This is all backed up by the "chivalry hypothesis/thesis" in criminology, which has been studied in books since the 1920s and 1950s, see our criminal justice page for more: https://cjsbam.tiiny.site/

When we combine this perception bias with the well-documented finding that men who are raped or sexually assaulted by women often do not even recognize it as victimization, it becomes entirely reasonable to conclude that men are misremembering (or failing to report) female-perpetrated violence over time—including potentially reclassifying female rapes they experienced as less violent or forgetting them altogether while retaining clearer memories of male-perpetrated assaults.

**“Many of the men struggled to comprehend or to understand what had happened to them. For some, this was because they did not or could not recognize themselves as victims of sexual abuse, at least not immediately after their FTP experience(s). For example, Participant 5 explained, ‘I didn’t disclose it because I didn’t recognize it’. Moreover, the gender dynamics of FTP cases, where the perpetrator is female, and the victim is male, acted as a barrier to some men understanding that they had been victimized.”**

Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02697580241238768

Newer versions of the NIPSVS have fiddled with the instruments to cause male victims to be counted less or not at all,  which was to be expected based on Mary Koss, etc: https://youtu.be/watch?v=0ncjGFIFPJI

Larimer et al. (1999)

Title: Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms Journal: Sex Roles

Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1018807223378

Men (Victim of Female Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion 15–17% Repeated requests, guilt, or emotional pressure
Physical Coercion 4–6% Use of physical force or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion 10–12% Unwanted sex while drunk or high

Women (Victim of Male Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion 20–22% Repeated requests, guilt, or emotional pressure
Physical Coercion 10–12% Use of physical force or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion 14–16% Unwanted sex while drunk or high

Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1998):

Title: Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too Journal: Journal of Sex Research

Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224498809551418

Men (Victim of Female Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion 18–20% Arguments, guilt-tripping, or repeated pressure
Physical Coercion 5–7% Physical force, restraint, or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion 12–15% Too drunk or high to consent or resist

Women (Victim of Male Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion 28–30% Arguments, guilt-tripping, or repeated pressure
Physical Coercion 12–15% Physical force, restraint, or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion 18–20% Too drunk or high to consent or resist

Palmer et al. (2010)

Men (Victim of Female Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion ~18% Repeated verbal pressure or guilt
Physical Coercion ~6% Physical force or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion ~15% Unwanted sex while intoxicated
  

Women (Victim of Male Perpetrator)

Type of Coercion Percentage Description
Verbal Coercion ~22% Repeated verbal pressure or guilt
Physical Coercion ~14% Physical force or threats
Intoxication-Related Coercion ~19% Unwanted sex while intoxicated

Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3679644/

Now of course, these four studies do technically show a majority female victims, but: how marginal is it? We are talking a less than 5%-10% difference for all of these.

Do we have similar percentages of women in prison for sexual assault? No:
Percentage of Men vs Women Imprisoned for Sexual Assault (by Country):

Country % Women in Prison for Sexual Assault/Rape % Men in Prison for Sexual Assault/Rape Source
United States ~1.5–2% ~98–98.5% Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
United Kingdom ~2–4% ~96–98% Ministry of Justice – Women and the Criminal Justice System 2023
India < 1% > 99% National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)
Taiwan < 5% (estimated) > 95% Taiwan Ministry of Justice

So I'm sorry, but Feminists say all the time that "bigotry isn't sexism unless it's institutional and systemic." If that's fair, we can care more about the institutional and systemic privilege female sexual abusers have over mail ones.

Finally, check out our pages on domestic violence and FGM: https://revtrad-mgmandfgm.tiiny.site https://revtrad-dv.tiiny.site

We have evidence that most FGM is actually decided on, if not performed by, women. (And I don't want to hear about "special pleading" or "moving the goalposts," if some sick fuck only played with these body parts on children, you would consider that sexual assault.If they cut them off, it's only gotten worse.

And on domestic violence: there is tons of "consensual" sex that happens in the context of an overall abusive relationship, sometimes it's fair to consider that rape. If we have 500+ studies showing that women initiate domestic violence more, we could have no idea what's going on there.

Then all of this has to be tied into again, the idea the men don't even know their own victimization, and we really have no idea what's going on, other than a massive criminal justice system bias and massively messed up social perceptions, made worse by Feminist ideology. bEaring in mind, "we don't know" is STILL a reutation of the general attitude that "women are the majority victims."